EVE Search - [Serious Discussion] This game's community leaves much to be des...

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

[Serious Discussion] This game's community leaves much to be des...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3107	Posted - 2014.03.15 01:31:00 - [1] - Quote To the OP: You're suffering under the weight of misconceptions about how the game is played. I'll start with your examples. Destiny. Lol, just wow. Given this guy's attitude and total inability to opsec anything(combined with his obnoxious fans), what did anyone expect would happen? Yeah, people pipebomb him, people hellcamp him. He's made himself unwelcome, and a big giant target at the same time, that's pretty much the community policing itself. Daionnis. I had to look this guy up. He doesn't belong in EVE. He needs to go back to WoW, or Star Trek Online, or whatever kiddie ride he came from. He wants perfect safety, which is a phrase people like to use to claim that they should be allowed to pretend like other players don't exist. In a sandbox game, many consider such an attitude a capital crime. Personally I think he can go get stuffed, he doesn't want to play EVE, he wants to make EVE like every other game out there, and screw the people who like it just fine the way it is. Some of us don't take that kind of crap too well. Quote: People are leaving this game, daily, because they cannot handle the harassment, the griefing, the scamming, and the constant fear of losing everything they own or a chunk of their paycheck because of some opportunistic ass with an itchy F1 finger. Good. I'd rather they not sub, than they sub and act out later because this game isn't WoW in space. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3108	Posted - 2014.03.15 02:24:00 - [2] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics. So, how's it going with those pocos? Are they still sov structures? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3108	Posted - 2014.03.15 02:31:00 - [3] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: baltec1 wrote: I will never understand why people demand CCP change EVE entirely when games such as STO exist which offer exactly what they want. Because we play EVE, its marketed as a sandbox game, it should be a sandbox game. The developers should be performing their required role as developers of a sandbox game which is to act as referee's. They are not. The game play is stagnant. The so-called emergent gameplay is ganking (been in game since M0o and Zombie), the PvP is largely still spawn point based (been in game since 2003), the sov warefare is themepark (theres only one way to do it), the ships are imbalanced to the extent one hull, class or module (supers, caps, blops, cyno's, cats, archons) are used to the exclusion of any emergent new methods / tactics. So, how's it going with those pocos? Are they still sov structures? Stop off topic trolling. Says the person who just rolled out a giant off topic rant about sov in the first place? Oh, and pocos aren't sov structures, in case you needed to hear it another time. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 03:08:00 - [4] - Quote Anslo wrote: baltec1 wrote: Karon Grandolf wrote: EVE is changing all the time. These changes influence the balances between play styles and what is practically available experiences in the game. This in relation to established players as well as new ones. I found Infinity Zionas post on the game experience in null very interesting as I have almost no personal experience of that. It seems to support that EVE is evolving in a way that limits the available gameplay. Even if the mechanics are there, the combined net result of players and game mechanics means that large parts of the possible experiences are not practically viable to engage in. In short, EVE is becoming less of a game than what it could be. It is becoming more gamy, and less roleplaying and exploration friendly. Becoming less community oriented for non-combat players too. The peaceful industrial high sec corporation is not viable as a lifestyle in EVE, not because it's not mechanically available, but because there are no mechanics to protect that lifestyle from other competing lifestyles in the game. There are plenty of ways for an industrial corp to protect itself, its not CCPs fault many chose not to use them. I would also take any post infinity makes on null sec with a pinch of salt around the same size as the salt flats of Botswana. Meaning stop training industry and go train Pvp to fight back. In other words, play their way. Hurr. Not so. It's "stop holding your own head in the sand by pretending you can abdicate the ability to defend yourselves." Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 03:18:00 - [5] - Quote Anslo wrote: Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up? I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 03:35:00 - [6] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Anslo wrote: Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up? I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Bring your own. You don't accommodate your victims, why should I accommodate you? This pubbie built a fleet. Why can't you? The tools are there. Why do you whine instead of act? Grr, not whelping. By the way, how's the blog doing? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 03:42:00 - [7] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Anslo wrote: Is that your excuse for shooting fish in a barrel in highsec versus showing this loud mouthed pubbie consequences by blowing him up? I would be very interested to hear what your excuse is for explicitly refusing to fight someone without a fleet to back you up? Bring your own. You don't accommodate your victims, why should I accommodate you? This pubbie built a fleet. Why can't you? The tools are there. Why do you whine instead of act? Grr, not whelping. By the way, how's the blog doing? Resorting to changing goal posts huh? That's what I thought. :) Nice to know I worked and am now better than you. Blog is fine btw. Serves its purpose. I get eve mails thanking me for it! Started a new one for scope even. I'm not changing the goalposts at all. You're the one claiming gankers have no balls, while simultaneously managing enough sophistry to justify refusing to fight me without a fleet to back you up. You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple. You know it's why your cute little Proveldtariat failed so badly, too. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 03:56:00 - [8] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: I'm not changing the goalposts at all. You're the one claiming gankers have no balls, while simultaneously managing enough sophistry to justify refusing to fight me without a fleet to back you up. You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple. You know it's why your cute little Proveldtariat failed so badly, too. And now you see why Care Bears get upset. Irrelevant thought. You simply are not capable of amassing a force to fight me. Also the Proveldtariat didn't fail. We simply evolved. Come at us, bro. "The Proveldtariat didn't fail, we just stopped doing anything toward the goals we originally had". Gotcha. Come see what we accomplished! Unlike you lot, we let our actions speak without pontificating it. But again, you're simply incapable. Oh well. You've "accomplished" a minor league gatecamp in Huola that everyone and their brother knows about in advance. /golfclap Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 03:57:00 - [9] - Quote Divine Entervention wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple. I think because of this post it's fair to say this guy should be warned or possibly banned. Care to explain? Or are you just trolling? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 04:08:00 - [10] - Quote Divine Entervention wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Divine Entervention wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: You're a hypocrite and a coward, plain and simple. I think because of this post it's fair to say this guy should be warned or possibly banned. Care to explain? Or are you just trolling? https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Forum_rules?_ga=1.4786810.818293199.1393290763 Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack. Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so. That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 04:13:00 - [11] - Quote Divine Entervention wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Telling someone that I believe they are a coward is not a personal attack. Anslo is a coward. He's also a hypocrite for literally saying that an entire subset of players do not have any balls, while hiding behind his fleet to say so. That's just a fact, like saying that Infinity Ziona is a liar. He is, unless pocos became sov assets in the last few weeks. I'm so sorry for you. Knowing bags of hate like you exist is such a cruel reminder of how unfair life really is. I truly hope things get better for you. The funny thing is, that my daughter likes to sit on my lap when I'm on my suicide ganker character. She loves to watch as other ships blow up, her enthusiasm is hilarious. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 04:23:00 - [12] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: I'm tired of attempting to educate you however its incorrect to say I'm a liar for saying that POCO's act like sov assets or to refer to POCO's as sov assets in the context that I referred to them as such - since POCO's in null are always destroyed by the sov owning alliance and their own POCO's installed + they reinforce and have the same HP / mechanics as sov assets making them Sov Assets. Notice how frantically he dodges and gyrates, almost literally bending over backwards to justify such a statement. The Internet Gymnast in his natural habitat. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3109	Posted - 2014.03.15 04:32:00 - [13] - Quote Divine Entervention wrote: Erotica 1 wrote: ISD, please lock here and reopen on Reddit. Maybe a WoW subreddit would be appropriate as he will likely find his supporters there. Do you think choosing to play EvE over WoW makes you a better person? No, just a better gamer. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3110	Posted - 2014.03.15 05:01:00 - [14] - Quote Marvin Shields wrote: What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? Discussing moderation. Always a good idea. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3111	Posted - 2014.03.15 05:15:00 - [15] - Quote Marvin Shields wrote: Malcolm Shinhwa wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Marvin Shields wrote: What's wrong ISD? Can't handle the truth? Discussing moderation. Always a good idea. This thread is getting locked as soon as an ISD wakes up regardless. I'll help spur it along.... Just buy a New Order permit. Only 10mil isk for a year's worth of hisec mining. .. ISD's hate that sort of thing. Eh. I don't give a ***. I don't take kindly to someone coming in and arbitrarily removing content from a discussion because they don't like what's being said. The sad part is this particular member of ISD probably has a vested interest in keeping the info out of the public view for fear of certain entities* being shed in a bad light. Oh well. There goes a perfectly good threadnaught. Thanks ISD Ezwal! In before lock. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3111	Posted - 2014.03.15 05:50:00 - [16] - Quote Kyperion wrote: The only 'defense' CCP's shipfitting mechanics allow for those engaging in PVE... ESPECIALLY miners is a few seconds to GTFO if they detect a bad guy in a belt. Same for missioners... because for the most part you cannot fit even a combat ship for missions and still have a prayer in a PVP situation... and also because you can almost never overcome a One vs Many situation.... So lets give the gankers what they want... Put some ******* teeth on all merchant ships.... give the Barges deployable defense stations and EWAR mid slots.... Lets see how many of these elite champions of Highsec PVP will still be around when the barges strip miner could target and disintegrate their hull. "I can't be asked to fit or fly ships correctly, so give me the most overpowered anything possible, that'll show em!" Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3111	Posted - 2014.03.15 06:00:00 - [17] - Quote Kyperion wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Kyperion wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Kyperion wrote: The only 'defense' CCP's shipfitting mechanics allow for those engaging in PVE... ESPECIALLY miners is a few seconds to GTFO if they detect a bad guy in a belt. Same for missioners... because for the most part you cannot fit even a combat ship for missions and still have a prayer in a PVP situation... and also because you can almost never overcome a One vs Many situation.... So lets give the gankers what they want... Put some ***** teeth on all merchant ships.... give the Barges deployable defense stations and EWAR mid slots.... Lets see how many of these elite champions of Highsec PVP will still be around when the barges strip miner could target and disintegrate their hull. "I can't be asked to fit or fly ships correctly, so give me the most overpowered anything possible, that'll show em!" Yes, because shooting back is OP... ***** idiot "8 racks of missiles, Strip Miners that deal dps" Yeah, sure, totally not overpowered. Depends on the bonuses, 8 turrets with no bonuses would be half as effective as your typical gank ship Out of curiosity, how much would this monstrosity cost? 1, 2 billion isk? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3113	Posted - 2014.03.15 06:06:00 - [18] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Erotica 1 wrote: I propose this thread gets locked because OP is attacking the community- ranting, trolling, and surely a couple more things. I propose that you're proposing this thread gets locked because its exposed the obvious truth about the game, gankers and general asshats in game... In a similar manner to how you always howl about calling the mods when it's continually pointed out to you that you relentlessly lie about everything, and have no clue what you're talking about? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3113	Posted - 2014.03.15 06:21:00 - [19] - Quote Ranger 1 wrote: Tippia wrote: Kyperion wrote: Really there is no excuse not to give Merchant ships some tank and teeth, with the mobile structures we already have had an extreme design shift to self sufficiency. They already have that if you choose to. I'll have to say this, while I think there are plenty of options for a good player to use the ships, modules and tactics to avoid combat effectively I really would'nt argue with a properly balanced branch of hauler/miner vessels that actually depended more on point defense than tank or evasion capabilities. I'm reminded of merchant ships in WWII that were equipped with anti aircraft guns to act as (more or less disguised) escorts for supply convoys. Granted you "can" throw a gun on some now, but I'm talking about one that actually might have a chance of taking out a Catalyst or two quickly enough to have a small chance of surviving a gank attempt if the player is really on the ball. Obviously this would involve a lot of balancing issues, but still it would be a new dimension to the eternal struggle between the ganker and the ganked. Just a random thought, carry on. They don't have point defense guns in EVE. Drones fill that role, actually. It's observable in battleships especially. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3114	Posted - 2014.03.15 06:37:00 - [20] - Quote Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance. Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3115	Posted - 2014.03.15 06:50:00 - [21] - Quote Karon Grandolf wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance. Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have. If they exist but people rarely use them correctly, maybe there's something about them that makes them unsuitable or difficult to use? This is where hard data would be nice to have. Otherwise its just personal experience and HTFU etc. People are just stupid, lazy, greedy, or all 3. They're not too hard to use, they're just not mindlessly easy. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3116	Posted - 2014.03.15 07:09:00 - [22] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Karon Grandolf wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Karon Grandolf wrote: I don't want CCP to protect high sec dwellers, I want tools so that high sec dwellers can protect themselves sufficiently to adjust the forementioned balance. Those already exist. Few people use them correctly anyway. You don't need more safety because you're not properly using the safety you already have. If they exist but people rarely use them correctly, maybe there's something about them that makes them unsuitable or difficult to use? This is where hard data would be nice to have. Otherwise its just personal experience and HTFU etc. Nah you're being trolled. Both Kalrus and Trippia are resident forum trolls. They don't exist. We have a system in which a 2 million isk easy to train ship can put out 700 dps easily. The issue is not miners its the Catalyst. They were designed to be frigate destroyers, there is no reason they need 700 dps for a frigate. Its a broken ship. I would love to see the fit that costs 2 million isk and does 700 dps. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3116	Posted - 2014.03.15 07:21:00 - [23] - Quote Karon Grandolf wrote: One such tool could be to remove the Concord security of agressive war deccers for a limited time and a fee. Are you ****ing kidding? You do realize that you can legally shoot them back, right? With no consequences. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3116	Posted - 2014.03.15 07:33:00 - [24] - Quote Karon Grandolf wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Karon Grandolf wrote: One such tool could be to remove the Concord security of agressive war deccers for a limited time and a fee. Are you ****ing kidding? You do realize that you can legally shoot them back, right? With no consequences. That's exactly what I realize. Shooting back has very little consequence for the war deccers, that is one of the big problems. It is the war deccers that are being protected by Concord as it is right now. Neither of them are. You can shoot at each other freely. The defending corp can also call in allies to their side without an upper limit on numbers. The defender is, assuming they are at all competent, at an advantage during a wardec. And if they're not competent, then they deserve to dissolve or be docked up the whole time. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3123	Posted - 2014.03.15 15:30:00 - [25] - Quote Abon wrote: Arsine Mayhem wrote: Marvin Shields wrote: And what happened? What happened that day? Gaming press ate it up. Holy crap I remember Eurogamer, IGN, everyone talking about Alexander "The Mittani" Gianturco goading an audience of Eve players into harassing a suicidal man to hopefully see him go over the edge. What amazes me is: 1. He wasn't permabaned. 2. He isn't in jail for terrorist threats. 3. People still follow him, how pathetic are they? People that fill their KB's with hisec ganks and call it pvp, or wardec noobies trying to start a corp are losers also. First thing I look at on a KM is location. Easily shows the losers in the game. Terrorist Threats! Call the Cyber Police! Right? Cyber Police? We're well into Thought Police territory in this thread by now. Hell, we basically were on the first page. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3126	Posted - 2014.03.15 16:05:00 - [26] - Quote Anslo wrote: Tippia wrote: Anslo wrote: You're agreeing with me?...not sure how Im supposed to feel...ok hold on ill fix this. CCP BAN GANKER THEY OP TOO STRONK PLS NERF OR BAN K THX We'll see what the tally is after the fight, won't we? Of course, now you have an incentive to throw the match to prove a point. WHAT BET I DIDN'T MAKE A BET AND THROW THE MATCH YOU GOT NOTHIN ON ME TIPPIA. But yeah he won't show up. They never do :( I would point out that, when I offered to fight you one on one, you explicitly refused. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3126	Posted - 2014.03.15 16:09:00 - [27] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Anslo wrote: Tippia wrote: Anslo wrote: You're agreeing with me?...not sure how Im supposed to feel...ok hold on ill fix this. CCP BAN GANKER THEY OP TOO STRONK PLS NERF OR BAN K THX We'll see what the tally is after the fight, won't we? Of course, now you have an incentive to throw the match to prove a point. WHAT BET I DIDN'T MAKE A BET AND THROW THE MATCH YOU GOT NOTHIN ON ME TIPPIA. But yeah he won't show up. They never do :( I would point out that, when I offered to fight you one on one, you explicitly refused. And when I offered a fleet fight, cause a lot of bears want a piece of you, you changed topics because you are not capable. Step up, senpai. This isn't e honor crap. Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3126	Posted - 2014.03.15 16:14:00 - [28] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others. Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk? Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3126	Posted - 2014.03.15 16:21:00 - [29] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others. Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk? Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight? Why do you need a bunch of miners as targets before you're willing to fight? I don't. I do that on an alt, among plenty of other things. I play just about every part of this game, this character lives in a wormhole, for example. I even still have a ninja salvager. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3126	Posted - 2014.03.15 16:34:00 - [30] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Like I said, step out behind the coat tails of so many others. Get more coat tails. We're just pubbies. Why can't you rally other gankers to back up your big talk? Why do you need a bunch of other people behind you before you feel safe enough to take a fight? I thought that was how combat worked in this game? Theres no bushido code in 0.0... You're right, there isn't. But if you're going to call one person out on the forums and then literally refuse to not bring a fleet, it does kinda make you a *****. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3135	Posted - 2014.03.15 23:40:00 - [31] - Quote Mandarine wrote: D. I., you need to stop answering trolls They-¦re wired differently. Their moral pragmatism (which is a form of mild autism) is a consequence of their absence of empathy, which makes them see everything as a low-level conflictual situation in which one has to have the upper hand, since no universal truths are agreed upon. And just as gankers/scammers etc use complex meta and corrupt communication to generate Schadenfreude, your textual exchanges with them are disharmonious and rife with dishonesty, basic sophistry, and false emotional appeals on their part. It-¦s absolutely pointless. Given the content in the evemail you sent me the other day, you don't get to talk about anyone behaving with sophistry or a lack of empathy. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3137	Posted - 2014.03.15 23:56:00 - [32] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs.... Yeah, it's getting absurd. Some nutcase was claiming you can get 700 dps out of a 2 million isk Catalyst, for goodness sakes. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3140	Posted - 2014.03.16 00:29:00 - [33] - Quote James Amril-Kesh wrote: ButtFungus wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: Can a mod please clean this thread out. This is not Something Aweful forums - one of the comments in this thread suggests cutting off a womans genitals and feeding them to a dog ffs.... If you'd bother to read back to the posts quoted, you would see that they were talking about how not sleeping with a man's wife makes him a better man because he didn't do something bad, and the response was that not removing the first man's genitals and feeding them to a dog makes him a better man for not doing something even worse than the thing the first man did not do. At that point, I felt the need to mention that if someone does not sleep with your wife, you should not not remove his genitals, you should not remove your wife's genitals because she is the one who didn't commit infidelity, not the man. See how confusing things get when you open your mouth without fully understanding a situation? What the holy **** is this thread even about. Puppies, duh. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3144	Posted - 2014.03.16 03:00:00 - [34] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: How did a wimpering little **** like OP get over 60 likes on his post within 48 hours? So the assholes are the reason more happy special snowflakes who want to carefully control every single aspect of their gameplay experience don't play EVE? GOOD. Go play another game. Kalrus, Jenn and Trippia decided to post. If you're going to give two of us nicknames, it's rather impolite to not give Jenn one also. Get with the program. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3149	Posted - 2014.03.16 03:07:00 - [35] - Quote Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish. It takes 2 to tango. Oh, so much this. I didn't start tear harvesting because I felt like it. I started it because the so called "victims" make such a fuss over a videogame that it's hilarious. If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3151	Posted - 2014.03.16 03:16:00 - [36] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Maybe if the unknown Joe didn't throw a childish tantrum every time something doesn't go his way, in a computer game, then people wouldn't try to harvest his anger and anguish. It takes 2 to tango. Oh, so much this. I didn't start tear harvesting because I felt like it. I started it because the so called "victims" make such a fuss over a videogame that it's hilarious. If you saw a grown man stub his toe and start screaming to the sky about how God needs to get all the pebbles off the sidewalk, you'd laugh too. It's so cute. I'm relevant and a bad ass cause I can make bears cry! But I can't actually get together a fleet or be relevant beyond tear collecting...but it's cool! I'm cool guys, right? ...guise? Hue. If you're going to call me out and refuse to not fight in a fleet, you don't get to keep crying about it. If you have a problem with me, come find me and duel/gank/bump/wardec me. But don't get butthurt because I refuse to jump through hoops for you. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3151	Posted - 2014.03.16 03:21:00 - [37] - Quote Anslo wrote: Why would I wardec an alt of a loud mouthed coward? I prove my point with every one of your **** posts :3 get rekt, nerd. Why would I bother to fight a loudmouthed coward who only fights 10 to 1? I prove my point with every blowhard post you make. How's that Proveldtariat thing doing? Stopped any ganks lately? Oh, and you're a shitflinging coward who hides in NPC corps, because you got chased out of real ones. There's that too. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3153	Posted - 2014.03.16 03:31:00 - [38] - Quote Haedonism Bot wrote: I dig this thread. Of course, I've only read page 1 so far, and ISD Ezwal already deleted half of it. (Dude, stop doing that, seriously, let the people talk.) Ah, he's got a job to do, lay off. Yes, it's voluntary, but if you're going to sign up for something (like stopping ganks in highsec cough Anslo cough), then you might as well have the intestinal fortitude to see it through. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3154	Posted - 2014.03.16 03:34:00 - [39] - Quote Haedonism Bot wrote: Ooh, Anslo is here, I love trolling that dude. I'll be back tomorrow. He gets so very upset when you won't fight him on his very specific terms, doesn't he? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3154	Posted - 2014.03.16 03:43:00 - [40] - Quote Anslo wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Haedonism Bot wrote: Ooh, Anslo is here, I love trolling that dude. I'll be back tomorrow. He gets so very upset when you won't fight him on his very specific terms, doesn't he? Kaar gets so very trollish when you point out that he can never fight back anything but miners~ If you call me a national socialist, I'll have Miner Bingo. You're a "PvP player", supposedly, but I am pretty sure that Lord James will give me this one. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3155	Posted - 2014.03.16 04:33:00 - [41] - Quote Ok, so slapstick comedy is ok, 3 Stooges stuff and all that. But hurting someone else's character in a videogame... is not? Are you literally insane? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.